The critical role of effective hearing protection in competitive precision rifle shooting is undeniable, yet often overlooked. A recent annual survey, conducted by precisionrifleblog.com as part of their renowned "What The Pros Use" reports, has delved into the specific ear protection choices of the 200 top-ranked shooters in the PRS Open Division. This data-driven analysis cuts through marketing claims to reveal what gear elite competitors trust to safeguard their hearing while maintaining situational awareness on the line.
According to the survey, a clear trend emerges regarding form factor: 56% of these top-tier marksmen prefer in-ear hearing protection, while 42% opt for traditional over-ear muffs. A small fraction reported utilizing both for double protection against the high decibel output of typical competition muzzle brakes. The increasing popularity of in-ear solutions is attributed to technological advancements, offering active noise reduction, superior clarity, and minimal bulk. Competitors note that in-ears prevent interference with rifle stocks, cheek weld, or headwear, and provide a cooler, lighter experience during extended match days.
Conversely, over-ear muffs retain a segment of the market due to their perceived value, consistent seal, inherent simplicity, and reliable protection. While both form factors can deliver adequate hearing protection when properly used, the data indicates a prevailing shift towards in-ear designs among the PRS elite.
When examining functionality, electronic hearing protection overwhelmingly dominates, with 81% of pro shooters employing such devices, compared to 18% who rely on passive ear pro. Electronic models are crucial for amplifying range commands, stage timers, and other ambient sounds, while instantaneously suppressing firearm discharge. Of the 33 shooters using passive protection, 61% utilized generic foam earplugs, and 39% opted for custom-molded non-electronic solutions, demonstrating that simpler options can still be effective, with three top-10 finishers using passive setups.
The survey also identified specific brand preferences among the pros, excluding generic options. Sordin emerged as the leading brand, chosen by 17% of the top 200 PRS competitors. All Sordin users specifically reported deploying the Sordin Supreme Pro-X Electronic Earmuffs, a testament to their comfort, reliability, and sound clarity under match conditions, with a street price of approximately $340. Notably, Sordin was the most popular choice among the top echelon, including two of the top 10 finishers.
Peltor secured the second spot, representing 12% of surveyed shooters. Among Peltor users, 75% utilized Electronic In-Ear Protection, with the Peltor EEP-100 In-Ear model, priced around $230, appearing to be the most popular choice. Walker’s accounted for 10% of users, with a preference for over-the-ear muffs (78%) over in-ear models (22%). The Walker’s Razor Slim Ultra-Low Profile Electronic Earmuffs, with a street price of about $41, were highlighted. The iconic Howard Leight Impact Sport Electronic Ear Muffs were favored by 8% of shooters, known for their balance of price and performance at roughly $56. OTTO Engineering’s NoizeBarrier In-Ear Electronic Ear Protection also represented 8% of pros, though it was noted that none of the top 50 shooters were reported to use them.
